J. Aberman

1.0k citations
10 papers · 870 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

J. Aberman

10 papers receiving 856 citations

Peers

J. Aberman
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 609
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 96
  • Pharmacology 212
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 38
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 203
Replace Anna Wisniecki with:
Anna Wisniecki United States
David L. Wolgin United States
Jonathan D. Sokolowski United States
Kelly S. Sink United States
Laurence A. Carr United States
Maria N. Arizzi United States
Showa Ueki Japan
Patrick A. Randall United States
Lyndsey E. Collins United States
Christopher L. Hubbell United States
J. Aberman relative to Anna Wisniecki United States Anna Wisniecki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Anna Wisniecki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Aberman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Aberman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Aberman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Aberman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Aberman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Aberman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Aberman. The network helps show where J. Aberman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside J. Aberman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Aberman Line = papers co-authored together J. Aberman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1999208
2 1998170
3 2003142
4 2002118
5 199962
6 199741
7 199838
8 199737
9 199834
10 200320

About J. Aberman

J. Aberman is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Neurology and Molecular Biology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 870 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (8 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (3 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1 paper) and Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (609 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (96 citations), Pharmacology (212 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (38 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (203 citations). J. Aberman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John D. Salamone, Maria N. Arizzi, Manuel Sandoval, Adrienne J. Betz, A. Makriyannis, Michael S. Cousins, Jonathan D. Sokolowski, Jennifer Trevitt, Peter McLaughlin and Anna Wisniecki. Their work appears in journals such as Psychopharmacology, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Behavioural Pharmacology, Neuroscience and Life Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact