Irwin Weinstock
Impact in
-
- Management and Marketing Education
- Accounting top 10%
- Accounting Education and Careers
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Papers in
-
- Advanced Battery Technologies Research 3
- Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies 2
-
- Accounting Education and Careers 3
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 1
- Co-authors
- Richard M. Coe (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Academy of Management Journal (2 papers)Journal of Marketing Education (1 paper)Journal of Accounting Education (1 paper)IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology (1 paper)Journal of Power Sources (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Irwin Weinstock
8 papers receiving 278 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Management of Technology and Innovation 67
- Accounting 100
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 48
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 70
- Management Information Systems 62
Countries citing papers authored by Irwin Weinstock
This map shows the geographic impact of Irwin Weinstock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Irwin Weinstock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irwin Weinstock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Irwin Weinstock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Irwin Weinstock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Irwin Weinstock. The network helps show where Irwin Weinstock may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Irwin Weinstock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 130 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 61 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 58 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 48 | |
| 5 | 1984 | 10 | |
| 6 | 1983 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 4 | |
| 8 | Characterization of recombination and control electrodes for spacecraft nickel- cadmium cells | 1966 | 1 |
About Irwin Weinstock
Irwin Weinstock is a scholar working on Automotive Engineering, Accounting, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Education and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 8 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Battery Technologies Research (3 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (3 papers), Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure (2 papers), Innovations in Educational Methods (2 papers), Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies (2 papers), Management and Marketing Education (1 paper), Spacecraft Design and Technology (1 paper) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (67 citations), Accounting (100 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (48 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (70 citations) and Management Information Systems (62 citations). Irwin Weinstock has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard M. Coe. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Marketing Education, Journal of Accounting Education, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology and Journal of Power Sources.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.