Iris Schöberl
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 2%
- Infant Health and Development
- Small Animals top 5%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Papers in
- Genetics 12
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies 12
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior 8
- Co-authors
- Kurt Kotrschal (13 shared papers)Manuela Wedl (10 shared papers)Andrea Beetz (4 shared papers)Barbara Bauer (7 shared papers)Judith Solomon (3 shared papers)Nancy R. Gee (2 shared papers)J. E. L. Day (2 shared papers)Erich Möstl (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Veterinary Behavior (6 papers)Animals (1 paper)Anthrozoös (1 paper)Behavioural Processes (1 paper)Behavior Research Methods (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustriaGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Iris Schöberl
13 papers receiving 337 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Pharmacy 70
- Small Animals 111
- Genetics 327
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 112
- Geography, Planning and Development 47
Countries citing papers authored by Iris Schöberl
This map shows the geographic impact of Iris Schöberl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iris Schöberl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iris Schöberl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Iris Schöberl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iris Schöberl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iris Schöberl. The network helps show where Iris Schöberl may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Iris Schöberl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 71 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 1 |
About Iris Schöberl
Iris Schöberl is a scholar working on Genetics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pharmacy, having authored 13 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (12 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (8 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (5 papers), Infant Health and Development (2 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (1 paper), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (70 citations), Small Animals (111 citations), Genetics (327 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (112 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (47 citations). Iris Schöberl has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kurt Kotrschal, Manuela Wedl, Andrea Beetz, Barbara Bauer, Judith Solomon, Nancy R. Gee, J. E. L. Day, Erich Möstl, Kim E. Kortekaas and Franz F. Schöberl. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Veterinary Behavior, Animals, Anthrozoös, Behavioural Processes and Behavior Research Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.