Attachment & Human Development

838 papers and 31.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 838 papers published in Attachment & Human Development in the last decades have received a total of 31.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Attachment & Human Development usually cover Social Psychology (641 papers), Clinical Psychology (609 papers) and Demography (216 papers) specifically the topics of Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (615 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (431 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (214 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Attachment & Human Development are L. Alan Sroufe, Arietta Slade, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Thomas G. O’Connor, Marian J. Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Phillip R. Shaver, Mario Mikulincer, Allan N. Schore, Robert C. Pianta and Terri J. Sabol.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Attachment & Human Development

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Attachment & Human Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Attachment & Human Development.

Countries where authors publish in Attachment & Human Development

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Attachment & Human Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Attachment & Human Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Attachment & Human Development more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025