Iris Berent

2.4k citations
78 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Iris Berent

74 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Iris Berent
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 827
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 745
  • Linguistics and Language 280
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 572
  • Language and Linguistics 313
Replace Barbara Höhle with:
Barbara Höhle Germany
Reiko Mazuka Japan
Tanya Kraljic United States
Paula Fikkert Netherlands
Amanda H. Seidl United States
Patti Adank United Kingdom
Katherine S. White Canada
Megha Sundara United States
Duáne G. Watson United States
Sieb G. Nooteboom Netherlands
Iris Berent relative to Barbara Höhle Germany Barbara Höhle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Barbara Höhle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Iris Berent

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Iris Berent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iris Berent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iris Berent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Iris Berent

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iris Berent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iris Berent. The network helps show where Iris Berent may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Iris Berent, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Iris Berent Line = papers co-authored together Iris Berent links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006209
2 2011116
3 200989
4 200884
5 199982
6 201474
7 201055
8 201354
9 200137
10 201334
11 200133
12 200628
13 200227
14 201224
15 201224
16 201124
17 201323
18 201521
19 202121
20 201121

About Iris Berent

Iris Berent is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Linguistics and Language and Language and Linguistics, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (26 papers), Language Development and Disorders (21 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (16 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (13 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (13 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (12 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (11 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (827 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (745 citations), Linguistics and Language (280 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (572 citations) and Language and Linguistics (313 citations). Iris Berent has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tracy Lennertz, Vered Vaknin‐Nusbaum, Joseph Shimron, Donca Steriade, Judit Gervain, Paul Smolensky, Janet F. Werker, Steven A. Pinker, Gary F. Marcus and Evan Balaban. Their work appears in journals such as Cognition, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Open Mind and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact