Inmaculada León

866 citations
28 papers · 576 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Inmaculada León

25 papers receiving 556 citations

Peers

Inmaculada León
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 202
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 298
  • Social Psychology 270
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 124
  • Clinical Psychology 95
Replace Katie Hoemann with:
Katie Hoemann United States
Pietro Spataro Italy
Gisela Klann-Delius Germany
Karolina Urton Germany
Carlos Cornejo Chile
Pan Liu United States
Ethan Weed Denmark
Mika Naito Japan
Silvia Rigato United Kingdom
Sabine Seehagen Germany
Inmaculada León relative to Katie Hoemann United States Katie Hoemann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29×
Katie Hoemann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inmaculada León

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inmaculada León's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inmaculada León with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inmaculada León more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inmaculada León

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inmaculada León. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inmaculada León. The network helps show where Inmaculada León may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inmaculada León, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inmaculada León Line = papers co-authored together Inmaculada León links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201372
2 201163
3 201655
4 201552
5 199752
6 201443
7 201043
8 200740
9 201625
10 201722
11 200818
12 199813
13 201910
14 20149
15 20199
16 20218
17 20227
18 20077
19 20216
20 20216

About Inmaculada León

Inmaculada León is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (7 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (5 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (4 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (4 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (3 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (202 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (298 citations), Social Psychology (270 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (124 citations) and Clinical Psychology (95 citations). Inmaculada León has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Cuba and United States. Frequent co-authors include Manuel de Vega, Juan Hernández, José Miguel Díaz Gómez, María A. Bobes, María José Rodrigo López, Ileana Quiñones, Sonia Byrne, Manuel Martín‐Loeches, Agustín Lage and Pilar Casado. Their work appears in journals such as Discourse Processes, Clinical Epigenetics, Development and Psychopathology, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience and Frontiers in Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact