Inmaculada León

883 citations
28 papers · 654 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Inmaculada León

27 papers receiving 614 citations

Peers

Inmaculada León
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 231
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 320
  • Social Psychology 285
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 136
  • Language and Linguistics 64
Replace Katie Hoemann with:
Katie Hoemann United States
Gisela Klann-Delius Germany
Pietro Spataro Italy
Kathrin Rothermich United States
Karolina Urton Germany
Stéphanie Caillies France
Roman Feiman United States
Sabine Seehagen Germany
Sue R. Leekam United Kingdom
Pan Liu United States
Inmaculada León relative to Katie Hoemann United States Katie Hoemann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.5×
Katie Hoemann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inmaculada León

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inmaculada León's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inmaculada León with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inmaculada León more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inmaculada León

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inmaculada León. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inmaculada León. The network helps show where Inmaculada León may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inmaculada León, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inmaculada León Line = papers co-authored together Inmaculada León links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201691
2 201373
3 201166
4 199757
5 201554
6 201449
7 201048
8 200741
9 201631
10 201723
11 200822
12 199813
13 201910
14 20079
15 20149
16 20199
17 20218
18 20218
19 20227
20 20216

About Inmaculada León

Inmaculada León is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 654 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (5 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (4 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (4 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (3 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (231 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (320 citations), Social Psychology (285 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (136 citations) and Language and Linguistics (64 citations). Inmaculada León has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Cuba and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Manuel de Vega, Juan Hernández, José Miguel Díaz Gómez, María José Rodrigo López, María A. Bobes, Pilar Casado, Manuel Martín‐Loeches, Sonia Byrne, Ileana Quiñones and David Beltrán. Their work appears in journals such as Discourse Processes, Clinical Epigenetics, Development and Psychopathology, Brain and Language and Motivation and Emotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact