Ines Wilhelm

5.0k citations
46 papers · 3.8k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Ines Wilhelm

45 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Ines Wilhelm
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.7k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.6k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 351
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 477
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 323
Replace J. S. Morris with:
J. S. Morris United Kingdom
Virginie Sterpenich Belgium
Martin Desseilles Belgium
Susanne Diekelmann Germany
Terry D. Blumenthal United States
Henrique Sequeira France
Edward M. Ornitz United States
David J. Marcus United States
Géraldine Rauchs France
María Corsi‐Cabrera Mexico
Ines Wilhelm relative to J. S. Morris United Kingdom J. S. Morris's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
J. S. Morris · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Wilhelm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Wilhelm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Wilhelm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Wilhelm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Wilhelm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Wilhelm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Wilhelm. The network helps show where Ines Wilhelm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ines Wilhelm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Wilhelm Line = papers co-authored together Ines Wilhelm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011451
2 2009439
3 2007396
4 2011300
5 2008211
6 2012159
7 2014141
8 2015136
9 2012130
10 2013126
11 2007121
12 2012119
13 201399
14 201193
15 201482
16 201176
17 201362
18 201262
19 201461
20 201151

About Ines Wilhelm

Ines Wilhelm is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 46 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Wakefulness Research (34 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (17 papers), Sleep and related disorders (17 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (5 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.7k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.6k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (351 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (477 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (323 citations). Ines Wilhelm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jan Born, Susanne Diekelmann, Sabine Groch, Alexander Prehn‐Kristensen, Wolff Schlotz, Stefan Wüst, Brigitte M. Kudielka, Ina Molzow, Matthias Mölle and Lioba Baving. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and Psychoneuroendocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact