Ines Kapferer

699 citations
18 papers · 519 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Ines Kapferer

16 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Ines Kapferer
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Orthodontics 309
  • General Dentistry 55
  • Oral Surgery 142
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 16
  • Cultural Studies 57
Replace Ulrike Stephanie Beier with:
Ulrike Stephanie Beier Austria
Luis A Litonjua United States
Ronald E. Goldstein United States
J.D. Bader United States
Tar C. Aw United States
Ryan Olley United Kingdom
Ken Hemmings United Kingdom
W. David Brunson United States
Helena Markkanen Finland
J.D. Eccles United Kingdom
Ines Kapferer relative to Ulrike Stephanie Beier Austria Ulrike Stephanie Beier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Ulrike Stephanie Beier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Kapferer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Kapferer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Kapferer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Kapferer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Kapferer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Kapferer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Kapferer. The network helps show where Ines Kapferer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Ines Kapferer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Kapferer Line = papers co-authored together Ines Kapferer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2012193
2 2012108
3
Clinical performance of all-ceramic inlay and onlay restorations in posterior teeth.
201252
4 200638
5 201322
6 201217
7 201217
8 201013
9 201113
10 201011
11 20079
12
Lateral lower lip piercing--prevalence of associated oral complications: a split-mouth cross-sectional study.
20129
13 20108
14 20126
15 20152
16 20111
17 20080
18 20090

About Ines Kapferer

Ines Kapferer is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Orthodontics, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Oral Surgery, having authored 18 papers that have together received 519 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications (7 papers), Dental materials and restorations (4 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (2 papers), Dental Education, Practice, Research (2 papers), Dental Erosion and Treatment (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques (1 paper) and Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthodontics (309 citations), General Dentistry (55 citations), Oral Surgery (142 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (16 citations) and Cultural Studies (57 citations). Ines Kapferer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ulrike Stephanie Beier, Herbert Dumfahrt, Doris Burtscher, Christian Ulm, Johannes M. Giesinger, Stefan A. Hienz, Thomas Benesch, Rutger Persson, Johannes Zschocke and Markus Laky. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dental Education, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Journal of Periodontal Research, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica and European Journal of Medical Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact