India Lye

610 citations
12 papers · 111 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

India Lye

11 papers receiving 111 citations

Peers

India Lye
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 49
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 29
  • Emergency Medical Services 31
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 12
  • Leadership and Management 2
Replace José Miguel Pérez Villares with:
José Miguel Pérez Villares Spain
Óscar Peñuelas Spain
Jeff Breeding Australia
Uwe Hamsen Germany
Ulf Günther Germany
Audrey De Jong France
X. Nuvials Casals Spain
Elisabet Gallart Spain
M. McIlwaine Canada
Jehier Afifi Canada
India Lye relative to José Miguel Pérez Villares Spain José Miguel Pérez Villares's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
José Miguel Pérez Villares · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by India Lye

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of India Lye's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by India Lye with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites India Lye more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by India Lye

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by India Lye. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by India Lye. The network helps show where India Lye may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside India Lye, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with India Lye Line = papers co-authored together India Lye links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 202021
2 201918
3 202015
4 202012
5 202011
6 201811
7 20197
8 20187
9 20216
10 20192
11 20191
12 20200

About India Lye

India Lye is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, Surgery, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 111 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (5 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (3 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (1 paper) and Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (49 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (29 citations), Emergency Medical Services (31 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (12 citations) and Leadership and Management (2 citations). India Lye has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Italy and Spain. Frequent co-authors include John F. Fraser, Dylan Flaws, Amanda Corley, Oystein Tronstad, Sue Patterson, A. Spooner, Gabor Mihala, Claire M. Rickard, Nicole Marsh and Emily Larsen. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Critical Care, BMJ Open, PLoS ONE, Australasian Journal on Ageing and Journal of Infection Prevention.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact