Amanda Corley

81 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Amanda Corley
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Emergency Medical Services 515
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 193
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 157
  • Emergency Medicine 225
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 508
Replace Samantha Keogh with:
Samantha Keogh Australia
Evan Alexandrou Australia
Stephen M. Schexnayder United States
Jonathan R. Studnek United States
Gabor Mihala Australia
Tom B. Rice United States
Marilyn Schallom United States
Sheila Adam United Kingdom
Ann Thompson United States
Antoinette Spevetz United States
Amanda Corley relative to Samantha Keogh Australia Samantha Keogh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Samantha Keogh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Corley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Corley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Corley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Corley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Corley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Corley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Corley. The network helps show where Amanda Corley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Corley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Corley Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Corley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016191
2 2018145
3 2009131
4 2020125
5 2018121
6 2015112
7 201271
8 201851
9 201246
10 201744
11 201444
12 201333
13 201632
14 201229
15 201929
16 201127
17 201427
18 201526
19 201525
20 201723

About Amanda Corley

Amanda Corley is a scholar working on Emergency Medical Services, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (36 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (10 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (9 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (7 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (6 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (6 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (5 papers) and Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (515 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (193 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (157 citations), Emergency Medicine (225 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (508 citations). Amanda Corley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include John F. Fraser, Naomi Hammond, A. Spooner, Adrian Barnett, Claire M. Rickard, Amanda Ullman, Nicole Marsh, Gillian Ray‐Barruel, Marianne Wallis and Wendy Chaboyer. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Critical Care, BMJ Open, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Intensive Care Medicine Experimental and Infection Disease & Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact