Ina Ferris
Impact in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Joseph Conrad and Literature
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- History top 1%
- Scottish History and National Identity
- Travel Writing and Literature
Papers in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 6
- American and British Literature Analysis 3
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 3
- Narrative Theory and Analysis 2
-
- Irish and British Studies 7
- Co-authors
- Richard Maxwell (1 shared paper)Paul Keen (2 shared papers)Leith Davis (1 shared paper)Julia M. Wright (1 shared paper)Marianne DeKoven (1 shared paper)Stephanie A. Smith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Studies in Romanticism (5 papers)Modern Language Quarterly (3 papers)The Wordsworth Circle (2 papers)Nineteenth-Century Literature (2 papers)NOVEL A Forum on Fiction (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
Ina Ferris
23 papers receiving 137 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Literature and Literary Theory 145
- History 110
- Museology 28
- Anthropology 37
- Sociology and Political Science 112
Countries citing papers authored by Ina Ferris
This map shows the geographic impact of Ina Ferris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ina Ferris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ina Ferris more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ina Ferris
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ina Ferris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ina Ferris. The network helps show where Ina Ferris may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Ina Ferris, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 67 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1983 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 2 |
About Ina Ferris
Ina Ferris is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, History, Anthropology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 258 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Irish and British Studies (7 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (6 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (4 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (3 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers), Travel Writing and Literature (2 papers) and Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (145 citations), History (110 citations), Museology (28 citations), Anthropology (37 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (112 citations). Ina Ferris has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard Maxwell, Paul Keen, Leith Davis, Julia M. Wright, Marianne DeKoven and Stephanie A. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Romanticism, Modern Language Quarterly, The Wordsworth Circle, Nineteenth-Century Literature and NOVEL A Forum on Fiction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.