I.L. Bonta

171 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

I.L. Bonta
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Pharmacology 857
  • Biochemistry 355
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 595
  • Physiology 608
  • Biological Psychiatry 56
Replace Y.S. Bakhle with:
Y.S. Bakhle United Kingdom
Rufina Schuligoi Austria
Massimo Di Rosa Italy
S. H. Ferreira Brazil
H. O. J. COLLIER United Kingdom
E. W. HORTON United Kingdom
Yoshinori Kamisaki Japan
Kurt Racké Germany
J.M. Young United Kingdom
F. Dray France
I.L. Bonta relative to Y.S. Bakhle United Kingdom Y.S. Bakhle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Y.S. Bakhle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I.L. Bonta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I.L. Bonta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.L. Bonta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.L. Bonta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I.L. Bonta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.L. Bonta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.L. Bonta. The network helps show where I.L. Bonta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I.L. Bonta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I.L. Bonta Line = papers co-authored together I.L. Bonta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 175 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971115
2 1978111
3 1977102
4 1993100
5 197097
6 198270
7 197059
8 197158
9 198058
10 197156
11 197655
12 197754
13 199250
14 197748
15 199047
16 197842
17 198542
18 198041
19 197440
20 197939

About I.L. Bonta

I.L. Bonta is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biochemistry, having authored 175 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (53 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (28 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (20 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (19 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (16 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (11 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (857 citations), Biochemistry (355 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (595 citations), Physiology (608 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (56 citations). I.L. Bonta has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Israel and France. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Parnham, M. J. P. Adolfs, Shlomo Ben‐Efraim, J. Vincent, Peter C. Bragt, Freek J. Zijlstra, Hidde Bult, B. Boris Vargaftig, P. R. Saxena and M. W. J. A. Fieren. Their work appears in journals such as Inflammation Research, European Journal of Pharmacology, Prostaglandins, Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids and Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact