Igor Lashkov

27 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Igor Lashkov
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Automotive Engineering 137
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 70
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 48
  • Human-Computer Interaction 21
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 73
Replace Mohammad Shahverdy with:
Mohammad Shahverdy Iran
Mingqi Lu China
Haluk Eren Türkiye
Yehya Abouelnaga Germany
Amardeep Sathyanarayana United States
Haiwei Wang China
Hesham M. Eraqi Egypt
Duy Tran United States
Byungtae Jang South Korea
Igor Lashkov relative to Mohammad Shahverdy Iran Mohammad Shahverdy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mohammad Shahverdy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Igor Lashkov

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Igor Lashkov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Igor Lashkov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Igor Lashkov more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Igor Lashkov

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Igor Lashkov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Igor Lashkov. The network helps show where Igor Lashkov may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Igor Lashkov, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Igor Lashkov Line = papers co-authored together Igor Lashkov links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201999
2 202063
3 202324
4 202024
5 202119
6 201915
7 201513
8 201610
9 20239
10 20176
11 20205
12 20225
13 20245
14 20244
15 20254
16 20184
17 20194
18 20183
19 20183
20 20213

About Igor Lashkov

Igor Lashkov is a scholar working on Automotive Engineering, Social Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 27 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety (18 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (9 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (7 papers), Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods (7 papers), Image Enhancement Techniques (3 papers), Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) (3 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (3 papers) and Transportation Systems and Logistics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (137 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (70 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (48 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (21 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (73 citations). Igor Lashkov has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Alexey Kashevnik, Andrei Gurtov, Guohui Zhang, Nikolay Teslya, Andrew Ponomarev, Nikolay Shilov, Alexander Smirnov, Naohisa Hashimoto, Dmitry Ryumin and Alexey Karpov. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Expert Systems with Applications, IEEE Access, IEEE Sensors Journal and Future Internet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact