Ignacio Dobles
Impact in
- General Psychology top 5%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Representations and Identity
- Counseling Practices and Supervision
Papers in
-
- Cultural Differences and Values 2
- Social Representations and Identity 2
- Stress and Burnout Research 1
-
- Community Health and Development 3
- Co-authors
- Tuğçe Kurtiş (2 shared papers)Ludwin E. Molina (2 shared papers)Glenn Adams (2 shared papers)Alejandra Martínez (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Theory & Psychology (1 paper)Journal of Social and Political Psychology (1 paper)South African Journal of Psychology (1 paper)Investigative News in Education (Universidad de Costa Rica) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Costa RicaUnited StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Ignacio Dobles
6 papers receiving 196 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- General Psychology 31
- Social Psychology 110
- General Health Professions 68
- Health 19
- Sociology and Political Science 88
Countries citing papers authored by Ignacio Dobles
This map shows the geographic impact of Ignacio Dobles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ignacio Dobles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ignacio Dobles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ignacio Dobles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ignacio Dobles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ignacio Dobles. The network helps show where Ignacio Dobles may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Ignacio Dobles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 179 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 5 | La Psicología de la Liberación 25 años después de Martín-Baró: memoria y desafíos actuales | 2015 | 1 |
| 6 | Psicología de la liberación y psicología comunitaria latinoamericana. Una perspectiva | 2015 | 1 |
About Ignacio Dobles
Ignacio Dobles is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Education, Clinical Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 6 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Community Health and Development (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Social Skills and Education (2 papers), Social Representations and Identity (2 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (1 paper), Software Engineering Research (1 paper), Stress and Burnout Research (1 paper) and Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (31 citations), Social Psychology (110 citations), General Health Professions (68 citations), Health (19 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (88 citations). Ignacio Dobles has collaborated with scholars based in Costa Rica, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Tuğçe Kurtiş, Ludwin E. Molina, Glenn Adams and Alejandra Martínez. Their work appears in journals such as Theory & Psychology, Journal of Social and Political Psychology, South African Journal of Psychology and Investigative News in Education (Universidad de Costa Rica).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.