Ignácio Amigo

18 papers receiving 637 citations

Peers

Ignácio Amigo
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Aging 33
  • Clinical Biochemistry 89
  • Biological Psychiatry 20
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 151
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 26
Replace Claudia Savoia with:
Claudia Savoia Italy
Joanne Clark United States
Sangwoo Ham South Korea
Sandra Franco-Iborra Spain
Kalpita Banerjee United States
Daniel Jiménez-Blasco Spain
Scott J. Koppel United States
Jayoung Byun South Korea
Sergei V. Baranov United States
Zemfira Gizatullina Germany
Ignácio Amigo relative to Claudia Savoia Italy Claudia Savoia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Claudia Savoia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ignácio Amigo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ignácio Amigo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ignácio Amigo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ignácio Amigo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ignácio Amigo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ignácio Amigo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ignácio Amigo. The network helps show where Ignácio Amigo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ignácio Amigo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ignácio Amigo Line = papers co-authored together Ignácio Amigo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201399
2 201677
3 201674
4 201661
5 201349
6 201448
7 201447
8 201546
9 201634
10 201733
11 201823
12 201721
13 201217
14 20169
15 20165
16 20221
17 20141
18 20171
19 20200
20 20200

About Ignácio Amigo

Ignácio Amigo is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry, Physiology, Political Science and International Relations and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 21 papers that have together received 646 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (15 papers), ATP Synthase and ATPases Research (5 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (5 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Science and Science Education (3 papers) and Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (33 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (89 citations), Biological Psychiatry (20 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (151 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (26 citations). Ignácio Amigo has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Brazil and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alicia J. Kowaltowski, Carlos B. Rueda, Jorgina Satrústegui, Irene Llorente‐Folch, Beatriz Pardo, Sergio L. Menezes‐Filho, Araceli del Arco, Javier Traba, Luis Alberto Luévano‐Martínez and Paloma González‐Sánchez. Their work appears in journals such as Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, Science, Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and Free Radical Biology and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact