Ido Efrat
Impact in
- Geometry and Topology top 2%
- Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
- Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
- Advanced Topology and Set Theory
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
- Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
- Advanced Algebra and Geometry
Papers in
-
- Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory 41
- Advanced Topology and Set Theory 10
- Algebraic structures and combinatorial models 9
-
- Advanced Algebra and Geometry 21
- Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology 16
- Co-authors
- Ján Mináč (4 shared papers)Dan Haran (1 shared paper)Moshe Jarden (1 shared paper)Ivan B. Fesenko (1 shared paper)Michael D. Chapman (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Ido Efrat
47 papers receiving 388 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
- Geometry and Topology 391
- Mathematical Physics 262
- Algebra and Number Theory 121
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 74
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 61
Countries citing papers authored by Ido Efrat
This map shows the geographic impact of Ido Efrat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ido Efrat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ido Efrat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ido Efrat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ido Efrat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ido Efrat. The network helps show where Ido Efrat may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Ido Efrat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 36 | |
| 2 | Valuations, Orderings, and Milnor $K$-Theory | 2006 | 33 |
| 3 | 2011 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 24 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 18 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 18 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 14 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2003 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 7 |
About Ido Efrat
Ido Efrat is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Algebra and Number Theory and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (41 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (21 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (16 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (11 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (10 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (9 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (6 papers) and Polynomial and algebraic computation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (391 citations), Mathematical Physics (262 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (121 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (74 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (61 citations). Ido Efrat has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ján Mináč, Dan Haran, Moshe Jarden, Ivan B. Fesenko and Michael D. Chapman. Their work appears in journals such as Israel Journal of Mathematics, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, manuscripta mathematica and Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.