I-Chen Li
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Fungal Biology and Applications
- Phytochemistry and Bioactivity Studies
- Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds
Papers in
- Pharmacology 17
- Fungal Biology and Applications 16
- Phytochemistry and Bioactivity Studies 5
-
- Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds 5
- Co-authors
- Chin‐Chu Chen (28 shared papers)Li‐Ya Lee (9 shared papers)Wan‐Ping Chen (8 shared papers)Yen‐Po Chen (3 shared papers)Yueh‐Ting Tsai (5 shared papers)Yen‐Lien Chen (6 shared papers)Dar‐Bin Shieh (1 shared paper)Dong‐Hwang Chen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (4 papers)Molecules (3 papers)Food Science & Nutrition (2 papers)Journal of Fungi (1 paper)Toxicology Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
I-Chen Li
44 papers receiving 857 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Pharmacology 357
- Pharmacology 138
- Aging 17
- Complementary and alternative medicine 74
- Molecular Biology 374
Countries citing papers authored by I-Chen Li
This map shows the geographic impact of I-Chen Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I-Chen Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I-Chen Li more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by I-Chen Li
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I-Chen Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I-Chen Li. The network helps show where I-Chen Li may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside I-Chen Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 147 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 90 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 77 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 57 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 54 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 11 |
About I-Chen Li
I-Chen Li is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Food Science, Pharmacology and Plant Science, having authored 46 papers that have together received 873 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fungal Biology and Applications (16 papers), Phytochemistry and Bioactivity Studies (5 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (5 papers), Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds (5 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (4 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (3 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (3 papers) and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (357 citations), Pharmacology (138 citations), Aging (17 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (74 citations) and Molecular Biology (374 citations). I-Chen Li has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Chin‐Chu Chen, Li‐Ya Lee, Wan‐Ping Chen, Yen‐Po Chen, Yueh‐Ting Tsai, Yen‐Lien Chen, Dar‐Bin Shieh, Dong‐Hwang Chen, Kyle R. Ratinac and Joanna Biazik. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Molecules, Food Science & Nutrition, Journal of Fungi and Toxicology Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.