Ian Pitt

32 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Ian Pitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Human-Computer Interaction 86
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 30
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 189
  • Occupational Therapy 30
  • Computer Science Applications 37
Replace Cristina Manresa-Yee with:
Cristina Manresa-Yee Spain
Areej Al‐Wabil Saudi Arabia
Graham McAllister United Kingdom
Gerardo Herrera Spain
Javier Gómez Spain
Melanie Baljko Canada
Kelly Mack United States
Kirsten Ellis Australia
Sayan Sarcar Japan
Alyssa M. Alcorn United Kingdom
Ian Pitt relative to Cristina Manresa-Yee Spain Cristina Manresa-Yee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Cristina Manresa-Yee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Pitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Pitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Pitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Pitt. The network helps show where Ian Pitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Ian Pitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Pitt Line = papers co-authored together Ian Pitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010141
2 199630
3 202129
4 201125
5 201924
6 200623
7 201520
8 201915
9 202314
10 201210
11 20029
12 20238
13 20038
14 20067
15 20197
16
Design of speech-based devices : a practical guide
20036
17
Usability Evaluation of Educational Game Software for Children with Autism
20086
18
Multiple modalities in adapted interfaces
19955
19 20045
20 20075

About Ian Pitt

Ian Pitt is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction, Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tactile and Sensory Interactions (7 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (6 papers), Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (4 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (4 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (4 papers), Color perception and design (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers) and Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (86 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (30 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (189 citations), Occupational Therapy (30 citations) and Computer Science Applications (37 citations). Ian Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include David Murphy, Katie Crowley, Alistair D. N. Edwards, Mary Barry, Helen Kelly, Muhammad Shoaib, Andreja Istenič Starčič, Gavin I. Russell, Robert Stevens and Maurizio Mancini. Their work appears in journals such as Virtual Reality, Multimedia Tools and Applications, PLoS ONE, Applied Ergonomics and Internet Interventions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact