Multimedia Tools and Applications

236.3k citations
18.8k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
    • Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
    • Digital Media Forensic Detection
    • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
    • Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
    • Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
    • Video Analysis and Summarization
    • Advanced Neural Network Applications

Papers in

    • Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques 2.5k
    • Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption 2.0k
    • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques 2.0k
    • Digital Media Forensic Detection 1.7k
    • Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods 1.4k
    • Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques 1.3k
    • Video Analysis and Summarization 1.1k
    • Advanced Vision and Imaging 1.0k

Multimedia Tools and Applications

17.6k papers receiving 226.8k citations

Peers

Multimedia Tools and Applications
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 128.0k
  • Media Technology 19.6k
  • Signal Processing 23.2k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 10.6k
  • Artificial Intelligence 53.2k
Replace Pattern Recognition Letters with:
Pattern Recognition Letters China
Applied Sciences China
Neurocomputing China
Lecture notes in computer science United States
Pattern Recognition China
Neural Networks China
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems China
Neural Computation United States
Neural Computing and Applications China
Sensors China
Multimedia Tools and Applications relative to Pattern Recognition Letters China Pattern Recognition Letters's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Pattern Recognition Letters · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Multimedia Tools and Applications

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Multimedia Tools and Applications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Multimedia Tools and Applications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Multimedia Tools and Applications more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Multimedia Tools and Applications

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Multimedia Tools and Applications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Multimedia Tools and Applications.

About Multimedia Tools and Applications

The 18.8k papers published in Multimedia Tools and Applications in the last decades have received a total of 236.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Multimedia Tools and Applications usually cover Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (12.4k papers), Signal Processing (2.6k papers), Media Technology (2.0k papers), Human-Computer Interaction (889 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (4.1k papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (2.5k papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (2.0k papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (2.0k papers), Digital Media Forensic Detection (1.7k papers), Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods (1.4k papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (1.3k papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (1.1k papers) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (1.0k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Multimedia Tools and Applications are Vijay Kumar, Sumit Singh Chauhan, Amit Kumar Singh, De Rosal Ignatius Moses Setiadi, Munish Kumar, Jitendra V. Tembhurne, Tausif Diwan, Adnan Gutub, Shuihua Wang‎ and Yudong Zhang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact