Ian Needham

2.8k citations
60 papers · 2.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Ian Needham

58 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Ian Needham
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 414
  • Clinical Psychology 630
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 132
  • Sociology and Political Science 995
  • Health 141
Replace Linda G. Bell with:
Linda G. Bell United States
Hildegard E. Peplau United States
Kathleen Ryan Delaney United States
Dagfinn Nåden Norway
Barbara Pesut Canada
Pádraig MacNeela Ireland
Gerald A. Farrell Australia
Andrew J. Cashin Australia
Niels Buus Denmark
Suzanne Gordon United States
Ian Needham relative to Linda G. Bell United States Linda G. Bell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.6×
Linda G. Bell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Needham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Needham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Needham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Needham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Needham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Needham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Needham. The network helps show where Ian Needham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian Needham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Needham Line = papers co-authored together Ian Needham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005231
2 2008178
3 2008150
4 2006149
5 2010127
6 2012123
7 2007111
8 200987
9 200775
10 200874
11 200960
12 200859
13 200653
14 201751
15 200644
16 200742
17 200939
18 200238
19 200938
20 200536

About Ian Needham

Ian Needham is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Cultural Studies, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Violence and Bullying (24 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (12 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (11 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (10 papers), Health and Medical Studies (8 papers), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (6 papers), Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (3 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (414 citations), Clinical Psychology (630 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (132 citations), Sociology and Political Science (995 citations) and Health (141 citations). Ian Needham has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Theo W.N. Dassen, Ruud J.G. Halfens, Maria Müller‐Staub, Joachim Ernst Fischer, Theo van Achterberg, Mary Ann Lavin, Sabine Hahn, Gerjo Kok, Christoph Abderhalden and Hans‐Joachim Haug. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, BMC Psychiatry, Nurse Education Today and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact