Ian Halliday

4.7k citations
143 papers · 3.3k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Ian Halliday

137 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Ian Halliday
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 660
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 829
  • Computational Mechanics 954
  • Aquatic Science 222
  • Global and Planetary Change 630
Replace Joseph P. Morris with:
Joseph P. Morris United States
C. J. Moore United Kingdom
Graham Hughes Australia
Jian Sheng United States
Martin Maxey United States
Yu‐Heng Tseng Taiwan
A. C. Fowler United Kingdom
Charles R. Smith United States
A.A. Mirin United States
T. Maxworthy United States
Ian Halliday relative to Joseph P. Morris United States Joseph P. Morris's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Joseph P. Morris · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Halliday

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Halliday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Halliday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Halliday more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Halliday

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Halliday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Halliday. The network helps show where Ian Halliday may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian Halliday, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Halliday Line = papers co-authored together Ian Halliday links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 143 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007204
2 2011191
3 2003149
4 1996148
5 2007142
6 2005125
7 2011124
8 2001123
9 2011115
10 2013100
11 200495
12 198989
13 202278
14
The Innisfree Meteorite and the Canadian Camera Network
197874
15 200662
16 200661
17 198157
18 200352
19 200848
20 199048

About Ian Halliday

Ian Halliday is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Computational Mechanics, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 143 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astro and Planetary Science (46 papers), Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies (39 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (29 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (21 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (16 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (16 papers), Marine and fisheries research (16 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (660 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (829 citations), Computational Mechanics (954 citations), Aquatic Science (222 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (630 citations). Ian Halliday has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include C. M. Care, A. A. Griffin, Alan T. Blackwell, Julie B. Robins, Michael M. Dupin, Jonathan Staunton-Smith, Sergey V. Lishchuk, Michelle J. Sellin, David G. Mayer and Lance L. Munn. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Marine and Freshwater Research, Physical review. E, Cardiovascular Research and The Astronomical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact