Ian D. Smith

114 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Ian D. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 577
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 433
  • Social Psychology 532
  • Equine 34
  • Safety Research 182
Replace Daniel J. Weigel with:
Daniel J. Weigel United States
Deborah H. Olster United States
Scott D. Gordon Australia
Stacey S. Cherny Hong Kong
Beben Benyamin Australia
Gene P. Sackett United States
Milton Diamond United States
Han de Vries Netherlands
Anjali K. Henders Australia
Michael J. Simpson United Kingdom
Ian D. Smith relative to Daniel J. Weigel United States Daniel J. Weigel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
Daniel J. Weigel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian D. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian D. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian D. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian D. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian D. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian D. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian D. Smith. The network helps show where Ian D. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian D. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian D. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Ian D. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 120 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983224
2 1992209
3 1969185
4 1985177
5 1983134
6 1969130
7 198397
8 198381
9 197480
10 198865
11 198257
12 200050
13 202049
14 197447
15 198447
16 197344
17 197540
18 197339
19 200330
20 198230

About Ian D. Smith

Ian D. Smith is a scholar working on Genetics, Education, Agronomy and Crop Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 120 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (16 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (13 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (12 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (6 papers), Pregnancy and Medication Impact (6 papers), Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies (6 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (5 papers) and School Choice and Performance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (577 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (433 citations), Social Psychology (532 citations), Equine (34 citations) and Safety Research (182 citations). Ian D. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Herbert W. Marsh, Jennifer Barnes, Rodney P. Shearman, Anthony A. Grace, J. M. Bassett, G. D. Thorburn, Donald A. Shutt, RodneyP. Shearman, A. Korda and Jōhn W. Parker. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Veterinary Journal, Prostaglandins, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Journal of Animal Science and Journal of Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact