Iain Field
Impact in
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
- Cryospheric studies and observations
- Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Oceanography top 10%
- Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Marine and coastal ecosystems
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Mark A. Hindell (4 shared papers)Masaaki Wakatsuchi (1 shared paper)Yasushi Fukamachi (1 shared paper)Guy D. Williams (1 shared paper)Takeshi Tamura (1 shared paper)Laura Herráiz‐Borreguero (1 shared paper)Shigeru Aoki (1 shared paper)Sohey Nihashi (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Antarctic Science (2 papers)Ecology and Evolution (1 paper)Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (1 paper)Marine and Freshwater Research (1 paper)Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Iain Field
11 papers receiving 459 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Atmospheric Science 287
- Oceanography 131
- Ecology 201
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 75
- Global and Planetary Change 116
Countries citing papers authored by Iain Field
This map shows the geographic impact of Iain Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iain Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iain Field more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Iain Field
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iain Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iain Field. The network helps show where Iain Field may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Iain Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 265 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 11 | Statute and theories of vicarious liability | 2019 | 1 |
| 12 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 13 | The 'Reasonable Tort Victim': Contributory Negligence, Standard of Care and the 'Equivalence Theory' | 2017 | 0 |
| 14 | 2018 | 0 |
About Iain Field
Iain Field is a scholar working on Ecology, Law, Atmospheric Science, Economics and Econometrics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 14 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine animal studies overview (6 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (3 papers), Legal principles and applications (3 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (2 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (2 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (2 papers) and Cryospheric studies and observations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (287 citations), Oceanography (131 citations), Ecology (201 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (75 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (116 citations). Iain Field has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Hindell, Masaaki Wakatsuchi, Yasushi Fukamachi, Guy D. Williams, Takeshi Tamura, Laura Herráiz‐Borreguero, Shigeru Aoki, Sohey Nihashi, Fabien Roquet and Daisuke Hirano. Their work appears in journals such as Antarctic Science, Ecology and Evolution, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Marine and Freshwater Research and Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.