I. Peña

37 papers receiving 514 citations

Peers

I. Peña
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Otorhinolaryngology 63
  • Oral Surgery 67
  • Urology 29
  • Animal Science and Zoology 52
  • Rehabilitation 27
Replace Fernando de Sá Silva with:
Fernando de Sá Silva Brazil
Rong Du China
Maria A. Landin Norway
İ. Taci Cangül Türkiye
Vinay V. Kumar India
Zhuo Xie China
Sabine Gröger Germany
Liu Wang China
Yao‐Dung Hsieh Taiwan
Edgar Ledesma-Martínez Mexico
I. Peña relative to Fernando de Sá Silva Brazil Fernando de Sá Silva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26×
Fernando de Sá Silva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. Peña

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Peña's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Peña with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Peña more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Peña

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Peña. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Peña. The network helps show where I. Peña may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I. Peña, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. Peña Line = papers co-authored together I. Peña links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200886
2 201361
3 201050
4 201137
5 201032
6 201331
7 201618
8 201318
9 201216
10 201116
11 201115
12 201214
13 201312
14 201712
15 199611
16 201110
17 201210
18 20099
19 20159
20 20219

About I. Peña

I. Peña is a scholar working on Surgery, Animal Science and Zoology, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Plant Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 541 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (4 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (3 papers), Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (3 papers), Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (3 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (2 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (2 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (63 citations), Oral Surgery (67 citations), Urology (29 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (52 citations) and Rehabilitation (27 citations). I. Peña has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Chile and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Lucas de Villalaín, Gonzalo Hernández, Luís Junquera, Einar Vargas‐Bello‐Pérez, Álvaro Meana, Paloma Lequerica–Fernández, Claudio Aguilar, Raúl R. Vera, Tania Rodríguez‐Santamarta and J.M. Fernandez. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Journal of Periodontal Research and Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugía bucal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact