I. Osvath

52 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

I. Osvath
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 573
  • Global and Planetary Change 740
  • Radiation 221
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 196
  • Oceanography 165
Replace H. Nies with:
H. Nies Germany
J. Gastaud Monaco
Luis León Vintró Ireland
Orihiko Togawa Japan
R. Delfanti Italy
L. Liong Wee Kwong Monaco
Núria Casacuberta Switzerland
Yuichiro Kumamoto Japan
C. T. Hess United States
S. R. Joshi Canada
I. Osvath relative to H. Nies Germany H. Nies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
H. Nies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. Osvath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Osvath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Osvath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Osvath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Osvath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Osvath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Osvath. The network helps show where I. Osvath may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I. Osvath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. Osvath Line = papers co-authored together I. Osvath links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997140
2 201294
3 199674
4 199456
5 199955
6 202053
7 201949
8 200143
9 200142
10 201535
11 200533
12 201032
13 201230
14 201628
15 201328
16 199722
17 201621
18 201521
19 202420
20 201019

About I. Osvath

I. Osvath is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Radiation, Atmospheric Science and Oceanography, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radioactive contamination and transfer (38 papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (26 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (12 papers), Nuclear and radioactivity studies (10 papers), Marine and environmental studies (6 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (5 papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (5 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (573 citations), Global and Planetary Change (740 citations), Radiation (221 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (196 citations) and Oceanography (165 citations). I. Osvath has collaborated with scholars based in Monaco, Spain and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Pavel P. Povinec, M.S. Baxter, H. Nies, J. Gastaud, Sandor Mulsow, Hugh D. Livingston, Mats Eriksson, E. M. Scott, Isabelle Levy and Vladimir Maderich. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, The Science of The Total Environment, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry and Radiation Protection Dosimetry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact