I Aurich

597 citations
9 papers · 479 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Hepatology top 5%
    • Liver physiology and pathology
  • Genetics top 5%
    • Mesenchymal stem cell research

Papers in

    • Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization 2
    • Ion channel regulation and function 1
    • Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior 1
    • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 2
    • Pancreatic function and diabetes 1

I Aurich

8 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers

I Aurich
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Hepatology 242
  • Genetics 239
  • Surgery 260
  • Biomaterials 33
  • Molecular Biology 155
Replace N. Parveen with:
N. Parveen India
Sharon C. Lehec United Kingdom
Yun Yu Hong Japan
Ryusuke Nakatsuka Japan
Sachie Nakao Japan
Rachael Turner United States
Milad Rezvani United States
Jose Meseguer-Ripolles United Kingdom
Hidetaka Hosono Japan
Qiang Hui China
I Aurich relative to N. Parveen India N. Parveen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
N. Parveen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I Aurich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I Aurich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I Aurich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I Aurich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I Aurich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I Aurich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I Aurich. The network helps show where I Aurich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside I Aurich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I Aurich Line = papers co-authored together I Aurich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2006260
2 2007148
3 196830
4 199917
5 196814
6 20025
7 19973
8 20042
9 19980

About I Aurich

I Aurich is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mesenchymal stem cell research (2 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (2 papers), Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (2 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (1 paper), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (1 paper), Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (1 paper) and Biochemical and biochemical processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (242 citations), Genetics (239 citations), Surgery (260 citations), Biomaterials (33 citations) and Molecular Biology (155 citations). I Aurich has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Czechia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bruno Christ, Wolfgang E. Fleig, Matthias Dollinger, Jana Luetzkendorf, Jens Walldorf, H. Aurich, Lutz Peter Mueller, Jan G. Hengstler, Wiebke Schormann and Kai Tisljar. Their work appears in journals such as Biotechnology Letters, Pharmacology, Gut, Experimental Cell Research and Analytical Biochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact