Hung‐Jen Lin

28 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers

Hung‐Jen Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 88
  • Pharmacology 75
  • Aging 6
  • Hepatology 23
  • Health Informatics 3
Replace Bo Jin with:
Bo Jin China
Jianqiong Yang China
Linan Zhao China
Wei-Jen Ting Taiwan
Shu Dai China
Xianan Sang China
Hala E. Abdel‐Hamied Egypt
Hung‐Jen Lin relative to Bo Jin China Bo Jin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Bo Jin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hung‐Jen Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hung‐Jen Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hung‐Jen Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hung‐Jen Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hung‐Jen Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hung‐Jen Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hung‐Jen Lin. The network helps show where Hung‐Jen Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hung‐Jen Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hung‐Jen Lin Line = papers co-authored together Hung‐Jen Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201762
2 201530
3 201026
4 201824
5 201724
6 201621
7
Principles and treatment strategies for the use of Chinese herbal medicine in patients at different stages of coronavirus infection.
202021
8 202020
9 201818
10 202218
11 201816
12 201816
13 201615
14 201915
15 201914
16 202013
17 199412
18 20219
19 20208
20 20235

About Hung‐Jen Lin

Hung‐Jen Lin is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine, Epidemiology, Pharmacology and Surgery, having authored 28 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies (5 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (4 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (2 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (2 papers), Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds (2 papers) and Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (88 citations), Pharmacology (75 citations), Aging (6 citations), Hepatology (23 citations) and Health Informatics (3 citations). Hung‐Jen Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sheng‐Teng Huang, Hung‐Rong Yen, Mao-Feng Sun, Jen‐Huai Chiang, Ching-Ping Hsu, Shyh‐Shyun Huang, Guan‐Jhong Huang, Jeng‐Shyan Deng, Wen‐Tzu Wu and Chia-Chou Yeh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Complementary Therapies in Medicine, Environmental Toxicology and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact