En‐Cheng Yang

3.6k citations
86 papers · 2.7k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

En‐Cheng Yang

83 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

En‐Cheng Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Insect Science 1.4k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.5k
  • Genetics 1.3k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 386
  • Ecological Modeling 45
Replace Victoria Soroker with:
Victoria Soroker Israel
Mathieu Lihoreau France
Natalie Hempel de Ibarra United Kingdom
Robert Κ. Vander Meer United States
Heather M. Whitney United Kingdom
Gianfranco Anfora Italy
Daniel J. Aneshansley United States
Patrick M. Guérin Switzerland
Hans M. Smid Netherlands
Valerio Mazzoni Italy
En‐Cheng Yang relative to Victoria Soroker Israel Victoria Soroker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Victoria Soroker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by En‐Cheng Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of En‐Cheng Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by En‐Cheng Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites En‐Cheng Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by En‐Cheng Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by En‐Cheng Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by En‐Cheng Yang. The network helps show where En‐Cheng Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside En‐Cheng Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with En‐Cheng Yang Line = papers co-authored together En‐Cheng Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008294
2 2017232
3 2012161
4 201686
5 200880
6 201780
7 201279
8 201968
9 200464
10 201260
11 199757
12 201656
13 200254
14 200453
15 200150
16 202150
17 200750
18 200647
19 199146
20 201642

About En‐Cheng Yang

En‐Cheng Yang is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Plant Science, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (42 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (32 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (29 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (18 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (9 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (8 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (7 papers) and Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.4k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.5k citations), Genetics (1.3k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (386 citations) and Ecological Modeling (45 citations). En‐Cheng Yang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joe‐Air Jiang, I‐Min Tso, Ya‐Wen Chuang, Ta‐Te Lin, Wen‐Yen Wu, Yu‐Wen Chen, Kentaro Arikawa, Cheng-Long Chuang, Daniel Osorio and Ted Maddess. Their work appears in journals such as Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, PLoS ONE, Journal of Experimental Biology, Journal of Insect Physiology and Behavioral Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact