Hulya Dagdeviren

949 citations
34 papers · 496 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Hulya Dagdeviren

34 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Hulya Dagdeviren
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Urban Studies 58
  • Development 32
  • Finance 77
  • Safety Research 47
  • Economics and Econometrics 128
Replace Chorching Goh with:
Chorching Goh United States
Tito Yepes United States
Ernesto M. Pernia Philippines
S. R. Osmani United Kingdom
Vasco Molini Italy
Eelke de Jong Netherlands
Robert Eastwood United Kingdom
Kalyan Sanyal India
María Ana Lugo United States
Victor D. Lippit United States
Hulya Dagdeviren relative to Chorching Goh United States Chorching Goh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Chorching Goh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hulya Dagdeviren

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hulya Dagdeviren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hulya Dagdeviren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hulya Dagdeviren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hulya Dagdeviren

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hulya Dagdeviren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hulya Dagdeviren. The network helps show where Hulya Dagdeviren may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Hulya Dagdeviren, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hulya Dagdeviren Line = papers co-authored together Hulya Dagdeviren links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201564
2 200255
3 200840
4 201140
5 201828
6 201727
7 201623
8
The Macroeconomics of Poverty Reduction: The Case Study of Bangladesh
200319
9 201818
10 201917
11 202116
12 202115
13 200914
14 201312
15 202011
16 201611
17 201610
18 201110
19 20059
20
Economic Policies for Growth, Employment and Poverty Reduction : Case of Zambia
20069

About Hulya Dagdeviren

Hulya Dagdeviren is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Finance, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 496 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (7 papers), Public-Private Partnership Projects (6 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (6 papers), Housing Market and Economics (5 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (5 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers) and Regional resilience and development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (58 citations), Development (32 citations), Finance (77 citations), Safety Research (47 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (128 citations). Hulya Dagdeviren has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Donoghue, John Weeks, Markus Promberger, Rolph van der Hoeven, Ewa Karwowski, Lars Meier, R. Parimalavalli, Binayak Sen, S. R. Osmani and Wahiduddin Mahmud. Their work appears in journals such as Competition & Change, Journal of Economic Geography, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Development and Change and Land Use Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact