Hooi Ling Foo

4.8k citations
136 papers · 3.7k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Hooi Ling Foo

127 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Hooi Ling Foo
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Animal Science and Zoology 1.4k
  • Food Science 1.5k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 591
  • Aquatic Science 249
  • Biotechnology 267
Replace Konstantinos C. Mountzouris with:
Konstantinos C. Mountzouris Greece
Bi Yu Taiwan
Chengbo Yang Canada
Emanuela Zanardi Italy
Joshua Gong Canada
D.R. Ledoux United States
Yin Wan Ho Malaysia
Kieran N. Kilcawley Ireland
Yuming Guo China
Guillermo Téllez‐Isaías United States
Hooi Ling Foo relative to Konstantinos C. Mountzouris Greece Konstantinos C. Mountzouris's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Konstantinos C. Mountzouris · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hooi Ling Foo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hooi Ling Foo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hooi Ling Foo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hooi Ling Foo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hooi Ling Foo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hooi Ling Foo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hooi Ling Foo. The network helps show where Hooi Ling Foo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hooi Ling Foo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hooi Ling Foo Line = papers co-authored together Hooi Ling Foo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 136 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019177
2 2021142
3 2019136
4 2016126
5 2020116
6 2014110
7 201995
8 200994
9 202193
10 200088
11 201486
12 201985
13 201083
14 201679
15 201377
16 201277
17 201973
18 201766
19 201961
20 201661

About Hooi Ling Foo

Hooi Ling Foo is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Aquatic Science, having authored 136 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (64 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (43 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (17 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (16 papers), Gut microbiota and health (14 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (12 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (11 papers) and Food and Agricultural Sciences (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (1.4k citations), Food Science (1.5k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (591 citations), Aquatic Science (249 citations) and Biotechnology (267 citations). Hooi Ling Foo has collaborated with scholars based in Malaysia, Iraq and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Teck Chwen Loh, Anjas Asmara Samsudin, Raha Abdul Rahim, Mohd Hair Bejo, Wan Ibrahim Izuddin, Rosfarizan Mohamad, Henny Akit, Ali Merzza Humam, I. Zulkifli and Nur Elina Abdul Mutalib. Their work appears in journals such as Animals, Journal of Applied Animal Research, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, Frontiers in Veterinary Science and Microbial Cell Factories.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact