Helli Merica

1.4k citations
21 papers · 1.1k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Helli Merica

21 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Helli Merica
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 732
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 373
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 957
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 94
  • Sensory Systems 17
Replace Pietro‐Luca Ratti with:
Pietro‐Luca Ratti Italy
Richard L. Koresko United States
Marjolaine Lafortune Canada
Soufiane Boucetta Canada
James J. Quattrochi United States
Seung Chul Hong South Korea
Marco Filardi Italy
Médhi Gilson Belgium
Gerhard Dirlich Germany
Jorge Luis López Ramos Mexico
Helli Merica relative to Pietro‐Luca Ratti Italy Pietro‐Luca Ratti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Pietro‐Luca Ratti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helli Merica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helli Merica's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helli Merica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helli Merica more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helli Merica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helli Merica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helli Merica. The network helps show where Helli Merica may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Helli Merica, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helli Merica Line = papers co-authored together Helli Merica links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998258
2 2001255
3 1992107
4 200474
5 199760
6 198546
7 199736
8 201336
9 199133
10 198632
11 200031
12 198624
13 198424
14 200421
15 198314
16
Brainstem origin for a new very slow (1mHz) oscillation in the human non-REM sleep episode.
200011
17 201110
18 200310
19 19939
20 19977

About Helli Merica

Helli Merica is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Hematology and Immunology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Wakefulness Research (17 papers), Sleep and related disorders (11 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (8 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (4 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (2 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers) and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (732 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (373 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (957 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (94 citations) and Sensory Systems (17 citations). Helli Merica has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include R. Blois, Jean‐Michel Gaillard, J.-M. Gaillard, Michael L. Perlis, Michael T. Smith, Donna E. Giles, Christophe C. Jouny, Florian Chapotot, Fabrice Espa and Lampros Perogamvros. Their work appears in journals such as Physiology & Behavior, Cerebral Cortex, Sleep Medicine Reviews, SLEEP and Neuroreport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact