Helen Eigenberg

787 citations
24 papers · 619 · h-index 16

Impact in

  • Health top 2%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
    • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Papers in

Helen Eigenberg

24 papers receiving 536 citations

Peers

Helen Eigenberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Health 242
  • Gender Studies 294
  • Sociology and Political Science 487
  • Clinical Psychology 145
  • Law 40
Replace Amanda Burgess‐Proctor with:
Amanda Burgess‐Proctor United States
Hillary Potter United States
Samantha Jeffries Australia
Shana L. Maier United States
Michèle Burman United Kingdom
Alison C. Cares United States
Kimberly J. Cook United States
Ruth E. Fleury‐Steiner United States
Jude Towers United Kingdom
Kathryn A. Branch United States
Helen Eigenberg relative to Amanda Burgess‐Proctor United States Amanda Burgess‐Proctor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Amanda Burgess‐Proctor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Eigenberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Eigenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Eigenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Eigenberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Eigenberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Eigenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Eigenberg. The network helps show where Helen Eigenberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Helen Eigenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen Eigenberg Line = papers co-authored together Helen Eigenberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200061
2 200355
3 199654
4 200350
5 198940
6 201232
7 199231
8 199331
9 201530
10 199229
11 200029
12 201527
13 200026
14 200320
15
Woman Battering in the United States: Till Death Do Us Part
200020
16 199018
17 200515
18 201514
19 199311
20 201711

About Helen Eigenberg

Helen Eigenberg is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Health, Law and Clinical Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 619 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (11 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (11 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (8 papers), Law in Society and Culture (4 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (4 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (242 citations), Gender Studies (294 citations), Sociology and Political Science (487 citations), Clinical Psychology (145 citations) and Law (40 citations). Helen Eigenberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Victor E. Kappeler, Christina Policastro, Kathryn E. Scarborough, Cindy Struckman‐Johnson, Christopher Hensley, Laura J. Moriarty and K Warner. Their work appears in journals such as Women & Criminal Justice, The Prison Journal, Journal of Criminal Justice, Criminal Justice Studies and Justice Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact