Women & Criminal Justice

600 papers and 7.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 600 papers published in Women & Criminal Justice in the last decades have received a total of 7.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Women & Criminal Justice usually cover Sociology and Political Science (458 papers), Clinical Psychology (216 papers) and Gender Studies (197 papers) specifically the topics of Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (277 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (143 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (139 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Women & Criminal Justice are Mary E. Gilfus, Jennifer C. Hunt, Loraine Gelsthorpe, Allison Morris, Natalie Todak, Cortney A. Franklin, Cassia Spohn, Amie M. Schuck, Lynette Feder and Joan A. Reid.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Women & Criminal Justice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Women & Criminal Justice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Women & Criminal Justice.

Countries where authors publish in Women & Criminal Justice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Women & Criminal Justice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Women & Criminal Justice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Women & Criminal Justice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025