Heike Schmidt

34 papers receiving 665 citations

Peers

Heike Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Oncology 386
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 22
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 34
  • General Health Professions 85
  • Health Information Management 15
Replace Natalie Pulenzas with:
Natalie Pulenzas Canada
Karin Ahlberg Sweden
Mindy E. Goldman United States
Margaret T. Harle United States
Suzanne Croy United Kingdom
Kelly K. Dineen United States
Gail L. Gamble United States
Stephanie Chan Canada
Laura Davis Canada
Amy M. Goetzinger United States
Heike Schmidt relative to Natalie Pulenzas Canada Natalie Pulenzas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Natalie Pulenzas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Heike Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heike Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heike Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heike Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heike Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heike Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heike Schmidt. The network helps show where Heike Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Heike Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Heike Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Heike Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016143
2 2022105
3 201456
4 201737
5 201737
6 201634
7 202326
8 201923
9 201720
10 201416
11 201615
12 201614
13 201614
14 202213
15 202313
16 201412
17 201512
18 201812
19 202412
20 202110

About Heike Schmidt

Heike Schmidt is a scholar working on Oncology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions, Health Information Management and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 683 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (31 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (3 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (2 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (386 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (22 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (34 citations), General Health Professions (85 citations) and Health Information Management (15 citations). Heike Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Margarete Landenberger, Dirk Vordermark, Patrick Jahn, Alexander Bauer, Karin Jordan, Mogens Grøenvold, Krzysztof Andrzej Tomaszewski, Monica Pinto, Deborah F. Fitzsimmons and Bernhard Holzner. Their work appears in journals such as Psycho-Oncology, Supportive Care in Cancer, BMC Cancer, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes and Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact