Heather Smith

33 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Heather Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Aging 95
  • Neurology 126
  • Immunology 272
  • Biological Psychiatry 30
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 225
Replace Xianrong Mao with:
Xianrong Mao United States
Jin‐A Lee South Korea
Nikhil Sharma United States
Victoria Scranton United States
Markus Dettenhofer United States
Anthony Anselmo United States
Hongda Li China
D. Randy McMillan United States
Helois Radford United Kingdom
Heather Smith relative to Xianrong Mao United States Xianrong Mao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Xianrong Mao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Heather Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Smith. The network helps show where Heather Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Heather Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Heather Smith Line = papers co-authored together Heather Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016156
2 2020156
3 2002121
4 1988120
5 2016115
6 2003100
7 201294
8 201687
9 201574
10 201540
11 201338
12 201831
13 202325
14 202422
15 202122
16 201321
17 199319
18 199318
19 199215
20 202014

About Heather Smith

Heather Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Physiology, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (5 papers), Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Digestive system and related health (2 papers) and Thermal Regulation in Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (95 citations), Neurology (126 citations), Immunology (272 citations), Biological Psychiatry (30 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (225 citations). Heather Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Giovanna R. Mallucci, C. Sweet, Ganes C. Sen, Anthony H.V. Schapira, Kenneth R. Pryde, Kai‐Yin Chau, Kristi L. Peters, George R. Stark, Theresa Rowe and Michael E. Cheetham. Their work appears in journals such as Hippocampus, Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Brain and Science Signaling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact