Hao Chang

2.7k citations
96 papers · 2.1k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Hao Chang

92 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Hao Chang
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Cancer Research 224
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 49
  • Physiology 367
  • Biological Psychiatry 23
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 141
Replace Karen E. Welty‐Wolf with:
Karen E. Welty‐Wolf United States
Patty J. Lee United States
Qianqian Liu China
Henrike Maatz Germany
Shingo Fujii Japan
Chris Van Geet Belgium
Zhibin Li China
Gloria Pryhuber United States
Timothy A. Pritts United States
Hideki Nomura Japan
Hao Chang relative to Karen E. Welty‐Wolf United States Karen E. Welty‐Wolf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Karen E. Welty‐Wolf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hao Chang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hao Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hao Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hao Chang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hao Chang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hao Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hao Chang. The network helps show where Hao Chang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hao Chang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hao Chang Line = papers co-authored together Hao Chang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012163
2 2015119
3 2016112
4 202168
5 201965
6 200464
7 201161
8 201758
9 200457
10 201656
11 201455
12 200450
13 201948
14
MiR-182 promotes cell proliferation by suppressing FBXW7 and FBXW11 in non-small cell lung cancer.
201847
15 201646
16 201240
17 201840
18 201437
19 201437
20 200837

About Hao Chang

Hao Chang is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Epidemiology, Cancer Research and Infectious Diseases, having authored 96 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutrition and Health in Aging (6 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (6 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (4 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (4 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (3 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers) and Vitamin D Research Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (224 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (49 citations), Physiology (367 citations), Biological Psychiatry (23 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (141 citations). Hao Chang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Taiwan and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Kuo‐Chin Huang, Chia‐Wen Lu, Kuen‐Cheh Yang, Long‐Teng Lee, Ching‐Yu Chen, Ju Wang, Yu‐Kang Chang, Minjun Ji, Min Hou and Zhipeng Xu. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrients, Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact