Hannah Cooper

17 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Hannah Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Biological Psychiatry 130
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 112
  • Neurology 134
  • Aging 11
  • Physiology 60
Replace Jinho Kim with:
Jinho Kim South Korea
Maryam Syed United States
Kyosuke Yamanishi Japan
Nicole Hanley Ireland
Judith A. Herlein United States
Paolo Mascarucci Italy
R. S. Perlstein United States
Francesca Tozzi Italy
Natalya Belevych United States
Hannah Cooper relative to Jinho Kim South Korea Jinho Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32.5×
Jinho Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Cooper. The network helps show where Hannah Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hannah Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hannah Cooper Line = papers co-authored together Hannah Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2016106
2 201874
3 202071
4 202070
5 201744
6 202032
7 198622
8 201814
9 20196
10 19875
11 20205
12
Pioneering respiratory care in the nursing home.
19843
13
Protection of Civilians in 2010: Facts, Figures, and the UN Security Council’s response
20113
14 20251
15 20251
16 20211
17
The diagnosis and general management of functional illness.
19671

About Hannah Cooper

Hannah Cooper is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 17 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (2 papers), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers), Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (1 paper), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (1 paper) and ATP Synthase and ATPases Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (130 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (112 citations), Neurology (134 citations), Aging (11 citations) and Physiology (60 citations). Hannah Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Miles Herkenham, Michael L. Lehmann, Dragan Maric, Victor Rizzo, Satoru Eguchi, Rosario Scalia, Kyle Preston, Tatsuo Kawai, Thaddeus K. Weigel and Abdel G. Elkahloun. Their work appears in journals such as Hypertension, Scientific Reports, Circulation Heart Failure, Journal of Hypertension and Cardiovascular Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact