Haksoon Ahn

40 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Haksoon Ahn
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Safety Research 181
  • Public Administration 49
  • Clinical Psychology 200
  • General Health Professions 186
  • Finance 39
Replace Kelley Fong with:
Kelley Fong United States
Sheila D. Ards United States
Svetlana Yampolskaya United States
Njeri Kagotho United States
Victor Wong Hong Kong
Calum Webb United Kingdom
Rachel Bray South Africa
Ian Gibbs United Kingdom
Uzoma O. Okoye Nigeria
Kathleen Noonan United States
Haksoon Ahn relative to Kelley Fong United States Kelley Fong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Kelley Fong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Haksoon Ahn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Haksoon Ahn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Haksoon Ahn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Haksoon Ahn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Haksoon Ahn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Haksoon Ahn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Haksoon Ahn. The network helps show where Haksoon Ahn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Haksoon Ahn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Haksoon Ahn Line = papers co-authored together Haksoon Ahn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201746
2 201244
3 201729
4 201725
5 201122
6 202021
7 202020
8 201719
9 201719
10 201515
11 201715
12 201614
13 201714
14 202011
15 201211
16 201811
17 201611
18 202010
19 20208
20 20218

About Haksoon Ahn

Haksoon Ahn is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Public Administration, having authored 43 papers that have together received 454 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Welfare and Adoption (25 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (21 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (13 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (7 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (7 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (5 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (181 citations), Public Administration (49 citations), Clinical Psychology (200 citations), General Health Professions (186 citations) and Finance (39 citations). Haksoon Ahn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Charlotte Lyn Bright, Yanfeng Xu, Wu Zeng, Terry V. Shaw, Daniel Keyser, Tomas Lievens, Julia O’Connor, Lynn Michalopoulos, Richard P. Barth and Donald S. Shepard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Child Welfare, Children and Youth Services Review, Child Maltreatment, Health Policy and Planning and International Journal of Social Welfare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact