H. G. Walker

933 citations
29 papers · 538 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

H. G. Walker

29 papers receiving 456 citations

Peers

H. G. Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 168
  • Animal Science and Zoology 127
  • Toxicology 27
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 115
  • Biotechnology 34
Replace H. T. Macpherson with:
H. T. Macpherson United Kingdom
R. M. Dolby New Zealand
Amy Logan Australia
D. Brewer United States
S.C. Kim United States
H. Tessier Canada
L. Chen Canada
Nabil M. Eweedah Egypt
Baocheng Zhu China
H. G. Walker relative to H. T. Macpherson United Kingdom H. T. Macpherson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
H. T. Macpherson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. G. Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. G. Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. G. Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. G. Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. G. Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. G. Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. G. Walker. The network helps show where H. G. Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside H. G. Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. G. Walker Line = papers co-authored together H. G. Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197285
2 195250
3 196049
4 197047
5 197946
6 196942
7 197427
8 198025
9 197424
10
The sugars of wheat bran.
196919
11 197113
12 198212
13 197411
14 197711
15 198010
16
Preparation and evaluation of popped grains for feed use.
19709
17 19538
18 19808
19 19727
20 19777

About H. G. Walker

H. G. Walker is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science, Ecology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (7 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (6 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (6 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (3 papers), Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (3 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (3 papers), Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science (2 papers) and Phytase and its Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (168 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (127 citations), Toxicology (27 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (115 citations) and Biotechnology (34 citations). H. G. Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include G. O. Kohler, W. N. Garrett, R. M. Saunders, R. M. McCready, Galvin M. Coppinger, Jack Guggolz, Tod W. Campbell, Anthony C. Waiss, C. K. Lyon and D. A. Dinius. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Poultry Science, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact