H. Baum

142 papers receiving 4.5k citations

H. Baum's Hit Papers

The assay of arylsulphatases A and B in human urine 1959 · 572 citations
5720+22+44Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

H. Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
  • Clinical Biochemistry 305
  • Biochemistry 297
  • Urban Studies 241
  • Hepatology 267
  • Physiology 792
Replace David J. Kennedy with:
David J. Kennedy United States
Norman M. Kaplan United States
Robert Hill United States
W. H. Butler United Kingdom
Richard Fry United Kingdom
Michael A. Williams United States
David Glick United States
Peter G. Shields United States
Stephen Davies United States
Michael T. Ryan Australia
H. Baum relative to David J. Kennedy United States David J. Kennedy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
David J. Kennedy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Baum. The network helps show where H. Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Baum Line = papers co-authored together H. Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 148 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The assay of arylsulphatases A and B in human urine
Hit paper breakdown →
1959572
2 1975319
3 1965215
4 1982199
5 1987165
6 1987132
7 1986131
8 1967126
9 1985122
10 1967119
11 2000106
12 1984100
13 197992
14 197192
15 199390
16 199589
17 197280
18 198474
19 196772
20
Mitochondrial antibodies in chronic liver diseases and connective tissue disorders: further characterization of the autoantigens.
198070

About H. Baum

H. Baum is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Hepatology, Epidemiology and Physiology, having authored 148 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver Diseases and Immunity (14 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (12 papers), ATP Synthase and ATPases Research (5 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (5 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (5 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (5 papers) and Urban Planning and Governance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (305 citations), Biochemistry (297 citations), Urban Studies (241 citations), Hepatology (267 citations) and Physiology (792 citations). H. Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include K. S. Dodgson, B. Spencer, Barry Halliwell, Mohammad Wasil, D HUTCHISON, E. J. Harris, Stephen J. Kirtland, P.H.W. Butterworth, John W. Porter and Michael A. Diamond. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Planning Education and Research, Biochemical Journal, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Biochemical Society Transactions and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact