H. Baum

131 papers receiving 4.1k citations

H. Baum's Hit Papers

The assay of arylsulphatases A and B in human urine 1959 · 556 citations
5560+22+44Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

H. Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
  • Clinical Biochemistry 275
  • Urban Studies 227
  • Biochemistry 272
  • Hepatology 247
  • Physiology 740
Replace David J. Kennedy with:
David J. Kennedy United States
W. H. Butler United Kingdom
Richard Fry United Kingdom
Toshihiko Ozawa Japan
A. B. Atkinson United Kingdom
David Glick United States
Michael A. Williams United States
Michael Barber United States
Stephen Davies United States
Michael Kelly United States
H. Baum relative to David J. Kennedy United States David J. Kennedy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
David J. Kennedy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Baum. The network helps show where H. Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Baum Line = papers co-authored together H. Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 134 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The assay of arylsulphatases A and B in human urine
Hit paper breakdown →
1959556
2 1975251
3 1965196
4 1982171
5 1987161
6 1987127
7 1967123
8 1986118
9 1985112
10 196798
11 200097
12 198491
13 197988
14 199584
15 199384
16 197183
17 198469
18 197269
19
Mitochondrial antibodies in chronic liver diseases and connective tissue disorders: further characterization of the autoantigens.
198067
20 201562

About H. Baum

H. Baum is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Hepatology and Physiology, having authored 134 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver Diseases and Immunity (12 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (11 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers), ATP Synthase and ATPases Research (5 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (5 papers), Hepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology (5 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (5 papers) and Fire dynamics and safety research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (275 citations), Urban Studies (227 citations), Biochemistry (272 citations), Hepatology (247 citations) and Physiology (740 citations). H. Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include K. S. Dodgson, B. Spencer, Barry Halliwell, D HUTCHISON, Mohammad Wasil, E. J. Harris, P.H.W. Butterworth, John W. Porter, Michael A. Diamond and Stephen J. Kirtland. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Planning Education and Research, Biochemical Journal, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Nature and Journal of the American Planning Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact