Guy Enosh

74 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Guy Enosh
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Public Administration 239
  • Health 250
  • Demography 199
  • Safety Research 120
  • Sociology and Political Science 402
Replace Monit Cheung with:
Monit Cheung United States
Ilan Katz Australia
Uma A. Segal United States
Roberta G. Sands United States
Haya Itzhaky Israel
Adital Tirosh Ben-Ari Israel
Elizabeth Lightfoot United States
Lisa Bunting United Kingdom
Sally Holland United Kingdom
Judy Krysik United States
Guy Enosh relative to Monit Cheung United States Monit Cheung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Monit Cheung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Guy Enosh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Guy Enosh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guy Enosh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guy Enosh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Guy Enosh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guy Enosh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guy Enosh. The network helps show where Guy Enosh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Guy Enosh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Guy Enosh Line = papers co-authored together Guy Enosh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009170
2 2000157
3 201079
4 201474
5 201560
6 200558
7 201456
8 201246
9 200945
10 201541
11 200840
12 201237
13 199835
14 201333
15 202033
16 200930
17 201727
18 199720
19 200520
20 200720

About Guy Enosh

Guy Enosh is a scholar working on Public Administration, Health, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (17 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (13 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (10 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (8 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (5 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (239 citations), Health (250 citations), Demography (199 citations), Safety Research (120 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (402 citations). Guy Enosh has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Adital Tirosh Ben-Ari, Zvi C. Eisikovits, Shay S. Tzafrir, Zeev Winstok, Eli Buchbinder, Ariela Lowenstein, Tova Band‐Winterstein, Einat Peled, Hani Nouman and Ravit Alfandari. Their work appears in journals such as Qualitative Health Research, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Health & Social Care in the Community, Children and Youth Services Review and European Journal of Social Work.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact