Guy Drapeau

106 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Guy Drapeau
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.5k
  • Genetics 1.3k
  • Physiology 628
  • Urology 112
  • Gastroenterology 86
Replace Sarah Dion with:
Sarah Dion Canada
Francis Rioux Canada
Ichiro Aramori Japan
J. Barabé Canada
R. Michael Snider United States
Xavier Emonds‐Alt France
Peter W. Abel United States
Madan M. Kwatra United States
Immaculada Herrero Fresneda Spain
Wesley J Thompson United States
Guy Drapeau relative to Sarah Dion Canada Sarah Dion's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Sarah Dion · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Guy Drapeau

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Guy Drapeau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guy Drapeau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guy Drapeau more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Guy Drapeau

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guy Drapeau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guy Drapeau. The network helps show where Guy Drapeau may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Guy Drapeau, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Guy Drapeau Line = papers co-authored together Guy Drapeau links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988334
2 1987316
3 1987225
4 1990154
5 1987142
6 1989135
7 1987133
8 1988130
9 1986129
10 1987113
11 198992
12 198680
13 198976
14 199076
15 198775
16 199071
17 199067
18 199467
19 199565
20 198464

About Guy Drapeau

Guy Drapeau is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, having authored 109 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (61 papers), Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (40 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (5 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers), Mast cells and histamine (3 papers), Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (3 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (2 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.5k citations), Genetics (1.3k citations), Physiology (628 citations), Urology (112 citations) and Gastroenterology (86 citations). Guy Drapeau has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Domenico C. Regoli, Sarah Dion, Pedro D’Orléans-Juste, Nour‐Eddine Rhaleb, François Marceau, N. Rouissi, Réjean Couture, Francis Rioux, Charles Advenier and Philippe Devillier. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Peptides, British Journal of Pharmacology, Neuropeptides and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact