Gregory M. Guild

3.0k citations
36 papers · 2.5k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Gregory M. Guild

36 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Gregory M. Guild
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.1k
  • Cell Biology 640
  • Insect Science 388
  • Aging 41
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 431
Replace James B. Nardi with:
James B. Nardi United States
Ruth Steward United States
Ward F. Odenwald United States
Stephen J. Poole United States
Paul R. Johnston Germany
Tatsuhiko Kadowaki Japan
Christos Samakovlis Sweden
Kumiko Ui‐Tei Japan
James W. Fristrom United States
Elisabeth Gateff Germany
Gregory M. Guild relative to James B. Nardi United States James B. Nardi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
James B. Nardi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gregory M. Guild

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gregory M. Guild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gregory M. Guild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gregory M. Guild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gregory M. Guild

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gregory M. Guild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gregory M. Guild. The network helps show where Gregory M. Guild may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gregory M. Guild, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gregory M. Guild Line = papers co-authored together Gregory M. Guild links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991377
2 1993181
3 1994154
4 1994154
5 1995130
6 1998118
7 1991102
8 1997101
9 199699
10 199682
11 199678
12 198074
13 200067
14 198666
15 200562
16 197762
17 200056
18 200542
19 198640
20 199540

About Gregory M. Guild

Gregory M. Guild is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology, Biomaterials and Immunology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (14 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (13 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (6 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (6 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (5 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (5 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (5 papers) and Heat shock proteins research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Cell Biology (640 citations), Insect Science (388 citations), Aging (41 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (431 citations). Gregory M. Guild has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Patricia S. Connelly, Lewis G. Tilney, L G Tilney, James W. Fristrom, Cynthia A. Bayer, Kelly A. Vranich, Michael K. Shaw, M S Tilney, D A Withers and Carl S. Thummel. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Cell Biology, Journal of Molecular Biology, Virology, Molecular Biology of the Cell and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact