Graham Nerlich

690 citations
38 papers · 260 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Graham Nerlich

36 papers receiving 218 citations

Peers

Graham Nerlich
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • History and Philosophy of Science 108
  • Theoretical Computer Science 23
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 94
  • Philosophy 63
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 84
Replace John M. Quinn with:
John M. Quinn
Brent Mundy United States
Howard Stein
Jon Dorling United Kingdom
Steven F. Savitt Canada
Yuri Balashov United States
Thomas Ryckman United States
Robert DiSalle Canada
Oliver Pooley United Kingdom
Joseph Melia United Kingdom
Graham Nerlich relative to John M. Quinn John M. Quinn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
John M. Quinn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Nerlich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Nerlich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Nerlich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Nerlich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Nerlich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Nerlich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Nerlich. The network helps show where Graham Nerlich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Graham Nerlich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Graham Nerlich Line = papers co-authored together Graham Nerlich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The shape of space
197651
2 199431
3 197924
4 199419
5 198214
6 200313
7
Einstein's Genie: Spacetime out of the Bottle
201312
8 199110
9 19618
10
Presupposition and Entailment
19657
11 19737
12 20057
13 19986
14 20054
15 19954
16 19794
17 19604
18 19913
19 19823
20 19643

About Graham Nerlich

Graham Nerlich is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Relativity and Gravitational Theory (6 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), Biofield Effects and Biophysics (2 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (108 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (23 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (94 citations), Philosophy (63 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (84 citations). Graham Nerlich has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include R. S. Downie, Peter K. Smith, Chris Mortensen and W. A. Suchting. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Philosophy, The Philosophical Quarterly, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Analysis and The Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact