Graeme C. Smith

119 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Graeme C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 258
  • Oncology 814
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 350
  • Clinical Psychology 402
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 366
Replace Hitoshi Okamura with:
Hitoshi Okamura Japan
Lynna M. Lesko United States
Eva Szigethy United States
Michael Stefanek United States
Ania Korszun United Kingdom
Paige Green United States
C. Richard Chapman United States
Thomas Hyphantis Greece
Hadine Joffe United States
Masatoshi Inagaki Japan
Graeme C. Smith relative to Hitoshi Okamura Japan Hitoshi Okamura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hitoshi Okamura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graeme C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graeme C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graeme C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graeme C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graeme C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graeme C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graeme C. Smith. The network helps show where Graeme C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Graeme C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Graeme C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Graeme C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 125 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007262
2 2004253
3 1998190
4 1999158
5 2006117
6 2004116
7 197196
8 199792
9
Demoralization, anhedonia and grief in patients with severe physical illness.
200587
10 200474
11 200467
12 197465
13 197054
14 199353
15 199551
16 196951
17 200051
18 198451
19 200348
20 200444

About Graeme C. Smith

Graeme C. Smith is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 125 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (19 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (11 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (11 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (10 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (9 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (8 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (258 citations), Oncology (814 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (350 citations), Clinical Psychology (402 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (366 citations). Graeme C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David M. Clarke, David W. Kissane, Sidney Bloch, Gregory L. Willis, Anthony W. Love, Brenda Grabsch, Dean McKenzie, George Fink, Raymond Snyder and Helen Herrman. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Brain Research, General Hospital Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and The Medical Journal of Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact