Graeme C. Smith

120 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Graeme C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 339
  • Clinical Psychology 847
  • Applied Psychology 198
  • Oncology 960
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 532
Replace Hitoshi Okamura with:
Hitoshi Okamura Japan
Thomas Hyphantis Greece
Paige Green United States
Masatoshi Inagaki Japan
Michael Stefanek United States
Jeffrey F. Scherrer United States
Eva Szigethy United States
David J. Dorer United States
Mary C. Dufour United States
Janine Giese‐Davis United States
Graeme C. Smith relative to Hitoshi Okamura Japan Hitoshi Okamura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Hitoshi Okamura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Graeme C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graeme C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graeme C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graeme C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graeme C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graeme C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graeme C. Smith. The network helps show where Graeme C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Graeme C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Graeme C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Graeme C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 126 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007259
2 2008259
3 2004251
4 1998189
5 1999155
6 1982152
7 2006116
8 2004115
9 197196
10 199792
11
Demoralization, anhedonia and grief in patients with severe physical illness.
200587
12 200474
13 200467
14 197465
15 197054
16 199353
17 200051
18 196951
19 199551
20 198450

About Graeme C. Smith

Graeme C. Smith is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Social Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 126 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (22 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (16 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (12 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (11 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (10 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (10 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (10 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (339 citations), Clinical Psychology (847 citations), Applied Psychology (198 citations), Oncology (960 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (532 citations). Graeme C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David M. Clarke, David W. Kissane, Sidney Bloch, Gregory L. Willis, Anthony W. Love, Brenda Grabsch, Dean McKenzie, Melissa A. Cyders, Sarah Fischer and George Fink. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Brain Research, General Hospital Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psycho-Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact