Nadia Ranieri
Impact in
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer survivorship and care
- Applied Psychology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies 2
- Brain Metastases and Treatment 2
- Oncology 4
- Cancer survivorship and care 2
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology 1
- Co-authors
- Steven Klimidis (3 shared papers)David M. Clarke (2 shared papers)David W. Kissane (2 shared papers)Sidney Bloch (2 shared papers)Anthony W. Love (2 shared papers)Geoffrey B. Smith (1 shared paper)Jillian Ikin (1 shared paper)Dean McKenzie (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (2 papers)Psycho-Oncology (1 paper)The Medical Journal of Australia (1 paper)International Journal of Psychology (1 paper)International Journal of Culture and Mental Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nadia Ranieri
9 papers receiving 525 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Oncology 262
- Applied Psychology 48
- Health 71
- Medical Terminology 2
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 141
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Ranieri
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Ranieri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Ranieri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Ranieri more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Ranieri
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Ranieri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Ranieri. The network helps show where Nadia Ranieri may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Ranieri, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 239 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 115 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 93 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 46 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 43 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 2 |
About Nadia Ranieri
Nadia Ranieri is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (2 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper) and Cultural, Psychoanalytic, and Sociopolitical Reflections (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (262 citations), Applied Psychology (48 citations), Health (71 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (141 citations). Nadia Ranieri has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Steven Klimidis, David M. Clarke, David W. Kissane, Sidney Bloch, Anthony W. Love, Geoffrey B. Smith, Jillian Ikin, Dean McKenzie, Raymond Snyder and Anthony Dowling. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Psycho-Oncology, The Medical Journal of Australia, International Journal of Psychology and International Journal of Culture and Mental Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.