Grace L. Jackson
Impact in
-
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Papers in
-
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 4
- Mental Health via Writing 1
- Deception detection and forensic psychology 1
-
- Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Benjamin R. Karney (5 shared papers)Andrea L. Meltzer (1 shared paper)James K. McNulty (1 shared paper)Thomas N. Bradbury (3 shared papers)David P. Kennedy (3 shared papers)Masumi Iida (1 shared paper)Sean P. Lane (1 shared paper)Marci E. J. Gleason (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Marriage and the Family (3 papers)Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Journal of Family Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Grace L. Jackson
7 papers receiving 407 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 146
- Social Psychology 207
- Applied Psychology 41
- Clinical Psychology 121
- Demography 65
Countries citing papers authored by Grace L. Jackson
This map shows the geographic impact of Grace L. Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grace L. Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grace L. Jackson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Grace L. Jackson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grace L. Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grace L. Jackson. The network helps show where Grace L. Jackson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Grace L. Jackson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 141 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 120 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 24 | |
| 7 | Beauty and the Flirt: Attractiveness and Approaches to Relationship Initiation | 2008 | 2 |
| 8 | White peach scale. | 2012 | 0 |
About Grace L. Jackson
Grace L. Jackson is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Clinical Psychology and Marketing, having authored 8 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers), Mental Health via Writing (1 paper), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (1 paper), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (1 paper), Deception detection and forensic psychology (1 paper) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (146 citations), Social Psychology (207 citations), Applied Psychology (41 citations), Clinical Psychology (121 citations) and Demography (65 citations). Grace L. Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin R. Karney, Andrea L. Meltzer, James K. McNulty, Thomas N. Bradbury, David P. Kennedy, Masumi Iida, Sean P. Lane, Marci E. J. Gleason, Gertraud Stadler and Joy Xu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Marriage and the Family, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Family Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.