G.M. Antón-Fos

688 citations
45 papers · 562 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

G.M. Antón-Fos

45 papers receiving 546 citations

Peers

G.M. Antón-Fos
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 320
  • Spectroscopy 187
  • Analytical Chemistry 66
  • Filtration and Separation 13
  • Organic Chemistry 167
Replace Emanuela Gancia with:
Emanuela Gancia Italy
Facundo Pérez‐Giménez Spain
R. Garcia‐Domenech Spain
Suresh Babu Mekapati United States
Zahra Garkani‐Nejad Iran
A.A. Sinkula United States
Olivera Čudina Serbia
Andrew G. Mercader Argentina
Sote Vladimirov Serbia
Piotr Kawczak Poland
G.M. Antón-Fos relative to Emanuela Gancia Italy Emanuela Gancia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Emanuela Gancia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G.M. Antón-Fos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.M. Antón-Fos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.M. Antón-Fos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.M. Antón-Fos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.M. Antón-Fos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.M. Antón-Fos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.M. Antón-Fos. The network helps show where G.M. Antón-Fos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside G.M. Antón-Fos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G.M. Antón-Fos Line = papers co-authored together G.M. Antón-Fos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199635
2 200134
3 199629
4 200623
5 200121
6 200521
7 200421
8 202220
9 200119
10 199619
11 200218
12 200418
13 201017
14 200617
15 199917
16 202016
17 201715
18 199215
19 202014
20 200514

About G.M. Antón-Fos

G.M. Antón-Fos is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Electrochemistry, having authored 45 papers that have together received 562 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (34 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (23 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (14 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (4 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (4 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (4 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers) and Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (320 citations), Spectroscopy (187 citations), Analytical Chemistry (66 citations), Filtration and Separation (13 citations) and Organic Chemistry (167 citations). G.M. Antón-Fos has collaborated with scholars based in Spain. Frequent co-authors include María J. Duart, Ramón García‐Domenech, Jorge Gálvez, P. Aleman, Luis Lahuerta Zamora, Jesus Vicente de Julián‐Ortiz, Joaquín Calatayud, Beatriz Suay‐García, Antonio Falcó and Facundo Pérez‐Giménez. Their work appears in journals such as Talanta, Journal of Chromatography A, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Pharmaceuticals and Chromatographia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact