Gladys J. Everson

932 citations
27 papers · 460 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Gladys J. Everson

26 papers receiving 385 citations

Peers

Gladys J. Everson
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 191
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 120
  • Animal Science and Zoology 53
  • Neurology 38
  • Sensory Systems 19
Replace B.K. Nandi with:
B.K. Nandi India
A.K. Majumder India
Agnes Fay Morgan United States
Robert L. Suber United States
Keiko Sakuma Japan
Edda Gabriel United States
Cai Zhang China
Handan Mert Türkiye
J. Ritskes‐Hoitinga Netherlands
H Weiser Germany
Gladys J. Everson relative to B.K. Nandi India B.K. Nandi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
B.K. Nandi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gladys J. Everson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gladys J. Everson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gladys J. Everson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gladys J. Everson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gladys J. Everson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gladys J. Everson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gladys J. Everson. The network helps show where Gladys J. Everson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Gladys J. Everson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gladys J. Everson Line = papers co-authored together Gladys J. Everson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196759
2 196848
3 195832
4 195931
5 196731
6 196730
7 196028
8 195726
9 196825
10 195920
11 196820
12
Aseptic canning of foods. 3. Pyridoxine retention as influenced by processing method, storage time and temperature, and type of container.
196416
13 196115
14 196112
15
Aseptic canning of foods. 1. Preparation and processing procedures.
196411
16 196311
17 19517
18 19547
19 19526
20 19606

About Gladys J. Everson

Gladys J. Everson is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trace Elements in Health (7 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (5 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (3 papers), Vitamin K Research Studies (3 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (3 papers), Biotin and Related Studies (3 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (191 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (120 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (53 citations), Neurology (38 citations) and Sensory Systems (19 citations). Gladys J. Everson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ruth E. Shrader, Lucille S. Hurley, C. Willet Asling, L. S. Hurley, B. S. Luh, Sherman Leonard and R. Getty. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nutrition, Food technology, Experimental Biology and Medicine and Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact