Giulia Polo

29 papers receiving 908 citations

Peers

Giulia Polo
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Clinical Biochemistry 226
  • Physiology 585
  • Cell Biology 140
  • Physiology 35
  • Rheumatology 97
Replace Raquel Dodelson de Kremer with:
Raquel Dodelson de Kremer Argentina
Ana Marcão Portugal
María Josep Coll Spain
Clare Beesley United Kingdom
L. J. M. Spaapen Netherlands
Simona Fecarotta Italy
Wenjuan Qiu China
Dimitar Gavrilov United States
R. Gatti Italy
N. U. Bosshard Switzerland
Giulia Polo relative to Raquel Dodelson de Kremer Argentina Raquel Dodelson de Kremer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Raquel Dodelson de Kremer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Giulia Polo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giulia Polo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giulia Polo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giulia Polo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giulia Polo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giulia Polo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giulia Polo. The network helps show where Giulia Polo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Giulia Polo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Giulia Polo Line = papers co-authored together Giulia Polo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017134
2 201792
3 201885
4 201972
5 201955
6 201853
7 201242
8 201440
9 201639
10 201038
11 201538
12 201536
13 202135
14 202224
15 202018
16 202117
17 201617
18 201116
19 201916
20 202013

About Giulia Polo

Giulia Polo is a scholar working on Physiology, Clinical Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Cell Biology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 928 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (19 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (8 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (5 papers), Trypanosoma species research and implications (4 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (3 papers), Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers) and Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (226 citations), Physiology (585 citations), Cell Biology (140 citations), Physiology (35 citations) and Rheumatology (97 citations). Giulia Polo has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Alberto Burlina, Alessandro P. Burlina, Chiara Cazzorla, Laura Rubert, Giovanni Duro, Leonardo Salviati, Mario Plebani, Martina Zaninotto, Daniela Gueraldi and Albina Tummolo. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), International Journal of Neonatal Screening, Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, Nutrients and Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact